SPONSORED LINKS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: TP 600 (560?) - cacheable RAM?

To: Rob Bell <rbell1@csc.com>
Subject: Re: TP 600 (560?) - cacheable RAM?
From: I Lee Hetherington <ilh@sls.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 27 May 1998 10:09:50 -0400
Cc: Christoph Eyrich <eyrich@zedat.fu-berlin.de>, thinkpad@cs.utk.edu
Comment: to {un}subscribe, send mail to thinkpad-REQUEST@cs.utk.edu
References: <Pine.SGI.3.96.980527133221.8416C-100000@komma.fddi2.fu-berlin.de> <356C1C5C.500FF841@csc.com>
Sender: ilh@sls.lcs.mit.edu

I didn't do any scientific comparisons, but I didn't notice any big slow
down going from 32MB to 96MB with either Win95 or Linux on a 233MHz MMX
770 (9549-1AU).  It certainly didn't get 40% slower!

--Lee Hetherington

Follow-Ups:
- Re: TP 600 (560?) - cacheable RAM?
  - From: Raybay <kglp@cia-g.com>

References:
- TP 600 (560?) - cacheable RAM?
  - From: Christoph Eyrich <eyrich@zedat.fu-berlin.de>
- Re: TP 600 (560?) - cacheable RAM?
  - From: Rob Bell <rbell1@csc.com>

Prev by Date: Re: TP 600 (560?) - cacheable RAM?
Next by Date: Re: TP 600 (560?) - cacheable RAM?
Prev by thread: Re: TP 600 (560?) - cacheable RAM?
Next by thread: Re: TP 600 (560?) - cacheable RAM?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread