[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Cracked TP, etc horror stories: my version
On Fri, 20 Jun 1997 01:52:37 -0500, Fabian Rodriguez wrote:
>Hello,
>
>As a new owner of a TP, I must say I disagree with some stories I heard here. Maybe the 365XDs have a
special support group at IBM?:) Maybe I haven't been a TP fan for so long...
>
>When I bought my TP365XD it was the store owners machine... I had to have it that week and he had been
promising the machine for a month, and always came up with inventory, B.O.s, etc... excuses. Finally he told
me well I could sell you mymachine.. except it has a cosmetic problem: there is a missing edge that covers the
space that would be left when you close the screen (it was really broken, now how he did it is a mistery to
me).
>
>"So I'll sell it to you $100 cheaper and give you the RAM upgrade cost (32MB). Ok, go for it. Now when I
came to pickup the machine he told me I would have to send it to service because there was a problem with
the battery. When at home, I noticed a crack that would prevent the keyboard from snapping correctly (when
you close it after opening for batt access) and also about 5-6 dead pixels on the DSTN screen. Having the
feeling I am in for some fun I call support, they Fedex a box, and it takes 10 days to get the computer back.
>
>Guess what! They replaced the WHOLE SCREEN, the edge that was missing (broken) and the keyboard.
Which is normal, you'd say. Well, not from what I've heard here...
>
>And why is it that every single person that sees my thinkpad just lets out a "*wow*" just knowing its a
thinkpad... other laptops dont get this kind of service. And that was *THE* reason I wanted to buy one, at my
own risk of testing the service & warranty at the same time I got the computer.
>
>Comments welcome,
>
>Fabian
>
>
I don't know that kind of service happening to me. My 701cs is my second ThinkPad, my first was the 355c,
which was nice because it was a TFT machine, only a 8.4" TFT (not as bad as my 7.4" mono monitor
though), and the display one day went "out", so I called IBM, they referred me to a local dealer, and it was six
months before I got my 701cs, because when I got it back, IBM said I had to pay for the damages that
apparently the dealer did. When I sent it in to the dealer again, because I had to use it with, again, an
external monitor while they were waiting for authorization and more replacement parts, it was in "kinda-sorta"
working condition. When I got it back, the hard drive starts up when you press the power switch, and that's
all. IBM wanted about $1800-$2K or something like that, so our homeowners insurance covered the
damages and I then recieved my 701 on March 6, 1996. And to make matters more interesting, the dealer
went out of business 2 weeks later. If anyone on the list live in the Pasadena/Los Angeles area, you may
have heard of them: Connecting Point Computers.
I guess that these incidents don't mean that I hate IBM or their service, except that it's just un-responsive
sometimes, and I still do get really mad though. But I currently have 6 working IBM machines, and am getting
more (older ones, that is), so I still like their quality. In many cases, it's a lot better than some of my 10 or so
other clones around here (out of 16).
Paul
Regards,
Paul Khoury
pkhoury@earthlink.net