SPONSORED LINKS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: 701C display prob



On Wed, 21 Jan 1998 19:16:47 -0800 (PST), Peckham Engineering wrote:

>
>On Wed, 21 Jan 1998, TROTTIER Tom wrote:
>
>> When you upgraded the 701 from 24MB to 40MB, did you notice a
>> difference? What OSes are you using?
>
>Yes, but not a huge one.  Ram has gotten so cheap, its was worth it
>to me.  The biggest difference is when switching around betweeen 
>applications,

Maybe it could be a parity error.  In non parity error, it could go at any time, parity
memory let's you know when you first boot up.

>there seems to be less disk thrashing.  I'm using the Evil Overlord
>Bill's fine products.  Win 95.
>
Huh?  That doesn't make sense - "Evil Overlord" and "fine products" in the 
same sentence?

-- 
Paul

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Paul Khoury
pkhoury@loop.com
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Proudly using OS/2 Warp 3 & 4
Donate your idle CPU time to a needy cause.
Join Team Warped and help to crack RC5-64!
Check out http://www.ionet.net/~colin/rc5.html for more information.

The Operating System/2 Version is 4.00 
Revision 9.029 
There are 24 Processes with 86 Threads.
This machine's uptime is 0d 21h 27m 33s 851ms.